Product Search


Twitter Updates

    Follow Wayside on Twitter

    Follow Wayside Gardens on Twitter

    Find Wayside Gardens on Facebook

     Subscribe in a reader

    www.flickr.com
    Wayside Gardens' photos More of Wayside Gardens' photos

    Blogarama

    Directory of Gardening Blogs

    Resources Blogs - Blog Top Sites

    Feb 21, 2008

    The Amaryllis Question

    Amaryllis Piquant, one of our best-selling Amaryllis bulbs Several of my coworkers and I were given planted Amaryllis bulbs last week.  The stalks on each were just beginning to make their way into the world.  The obvious move for us was to agree to race, to see whose Amaryllis grew the fastest.  However, the problem with having several Amaryllis plants in the same office led inevitably to an argument: what is the proper plural form of the word "Amaryllis?"
    This seems like a question that a group of employees of Wayside Gardens would know, especially garden writers.  However, with questions about plant names, there often isn't a single simple answer.  The plant names are often either Anglicized Latin or Greek, or Latinized English.  Also, they are usually created by botanists, who are rarely too concerned with the grammar questions they may be creating.  In the case of the plural for Amaryllis, there are four possibilities that we are considering: Amaryllii, Amaryllides, Amaryllises, and Amaryllis.
    Amaryllis Evergreen is an interesting new Amaryllis bulb with a light green color unlike any we've seen before Amaryllii seems like it could be right, as many words that end with a similar sound are pluralized that way (Fungus, fungi, etc.).  However, words that are pluralized that way generally end in a "us" rather than "is," so I think that it's safe to count this one out.  Amaryllides makes use of another form of Greek pluralization, and some botanists do use this.  I haven't actually met any of these botanists, though, and I really don't think that this is a very common form of the word (interesting fact, though: the word Amaryllis is Greek, and comes from a common girl's name in Ancient Greece).  Which brings us to Amaryllises or Amaryllis.  The basic question here is: should the word be changed at all in its plural form?  Amaryllis is a genus name, and the general rule in botany is that the genus name is never pluralized, even when it is being used in the collective.  However, this may be an exception to this rule, because the plants that we're usually referring to when we say "Amaryllis" are not Amaryllis Red Lion is a gorgeous traditional red Amaryllis bulb actually in the genus Amaryllis, which consists of a single species, Amaryllis belladonna, a South African plant more commonly called "Naked Ladies" or "Belladonna Lilies."  The plants more commonly called Amaryllis in the United States is actually of the genus Hippeastrum (which should definitely not be pluralized).  Thus, I think that it is safe to pluralize the word (unless you're referring to Naked Ladies), and that we should use the English plural form, Amaryllises (or just always call them "Amaryllis bulbs" or "Amaryllis flowers").  Plus, my spell-checker likes that form better.
    As to the Great Amaryllis Race of 2008?  I'm winning.

    Mar 09, 2007

    "Dinosaur Food" Hardier than Its Smaller Cousins

                                                                                         Dinosaur_food

    I received this email a couple weeks ago, and I thought it was interesting, and asked if I could share it.

    Here is a copy of that email:

    Can you confirm that the USDA hardiness zone of Petasites giganteus is actually Zone 4 as stated in the Wayside catalog?

    It's a difficult to get online info about this plant, but the few references I've seen suggest that it is safely plantable in one of the Zone 5s. I could probably sneak by with 5a in central Vermont (1,050 ft. elevation), but we're officially in 4b.

    Any additional insight?

    And here is my response:

    USDA zones 4-9 is correct for the Petasites Giganteus "Dinosaur food." Because the Wayside Gardens guarantee is based on those zones, the horticulturists who assign them rarely take risks by extending them too far. If you are in 4b, you should be fine. We actually have more of a problem with people living in places that are too hot, especially Florida.

    If you have tried “Dinosaur Food” and would like to share your experiences, please leave a comment. Someone has suggested to me that the bigger plant is hardier because of its extensive root system-- It seems logical to me. What do you think?

    John Durst
    Wayside Gardens Voice

    Feb 09, 2007

    Grafted Plants, Rootstock, and Scion

    Many of the roses and fruit trees sold from Wayside Gardens are grafted plants. Grafted plants are simply your desired plants grown on top of a hardy rootstock. The top part of the plant, the part that matters, is called the scion. The scion bears all of the fruit, flowers, or foliage that we want.

    Grafted plants are beneficial because they serve to increase variety, improve quality, and reduce prices. The extra hardy rootstock ensures survival for plants in zones that would normally be way too cold, allowing you to grow plants which would otherwise be off-limits. When a fruit tree is grafted to a mature rootstock allows fruit production much sooner than if you had to wait for the original roots to mature. You also know exactly what you are getting. Your plant has been cloned and will be exactly what you wanted. Clonal reproduction is also much quicker than growing from seed, making it more cost-effective.

    Plants are grafted onto very similar plants, usually the of same genus. Most of Wayside Gardens' grafted roses are grafted onto 'Dr. Huey', a hardy old rose with flat blooms that are deep crimson with a golden center. You will see them often at old home sites where the scions have long died off, and the Dr. Huey rootstock has flourished. The Wayside Gardens fruit trees are often grafted onto strong, wild versions of themselves. For example, there is pear rootstock, which, left to it's own devices, would grow tangled branches with nasty thorns. Make sure you trim back the growth from your rootstock if you don't want it to take over. Sometimes, in a case where the delicate scion cannot take the extremes and dies back, the rootstock may take over completely. Make sure you pamper your young grafted plant until it gets established.

    John Durst
    Wayside Gardens Voice
    jdurst@parkseed.com

    Oct 13, 2006

    Renaming Cornus, Chrysanthemums, and Cimicifuga

    Dear Fellow Waysiders:

    Oh dear -- does this mean we're only on the C's??? Heaven help us when they get to Salvia . . . but by that time I will have gone to my garden in the sky, where all my plants have lovely old-fashioned names (I don't like to call them "common" names) like Kiss-Me-Over-the-Garden-Gate and Pigsqueak, and anything that looks like a daisy is called a daisy.

    I hope my fellow Master Gardeners never read this, but there are times when I simply get weary with botanical nomenclature. Some days I feel that if I have to look up one more cultivar to verify whether it takes a trademark symbol or a registration mark . . . Now, plant patents I don't mind looking up. Anyone enterprising enough to go through the patent process deserves to have it mentioned every single time the plant is referred to. And I'm sure there's an equally arduous process for trademarking and registering, but they do cause confusion in our catalogs and on the website.

    It must be Friday!

    Sincerely,

    Kay

    KayRavenel@gmail.com

    Cornus, Chrysanthemum, and Cimicifuga

    Cimicifuga_black_beauty You always make me chuckle, Tamsin. You know my theory about this renaming business? I believe the powers that be are working their way through the alphabet. Remember the Anchusa/Brunnera business years back? Then it was Chrysanthemums. Now Cimicifuga is becoming Actaea. And Cornus angustata may be next for the chopping block!

    Over and out,

    Eb

    EbbettMonroe@gmail.com